文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

作者：Wang, Lixia[1,2,3];Yao, Liang[4];Yan, Peijing[2];Xie, Dongsheng[2,5];Han, Caiwen[2,5];Liu, Rong[6];Yang, Kehu[2,3];Guo, Tiankang[7];Tian, Limin[1]

第一作者：Wang, Lixia

通信作者：Tian, LM[1];Yang, KH[2];Yang, KH[3];Guo, TK[4]

机构：[1]Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[2]Gansu Prov Hosp, Inst Clin Res & Evidence Based Med, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[3]Lanzhou Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[4]Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Sch Chinses Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China;[5]Gansu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Clin Med, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[6]Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg 2, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China;[7]Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Surg, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China

第一机构：Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China

通信机构：[1]corresponding author), Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[2]corresponding author), Gansu Prov Hosp, Inst Clin Res & Evidence Based Med, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[3]corresponding author), Lanzhou Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[4]corresponding author), Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Surg, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China.

年份：2018

卷号：28

期号：11

起止页码：3691

外文期刊名：OBESITY SURGERY

收录：;Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85053422563);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000446158200051)】；

基金：Supported by Foundation of Lanzhou Science and Technology Bureau (Grant no. 2017-ZD-38); Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (Grant no. 18JR3RA052).

语种：英文

外文关键词：Robotic; Laparoscopic; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Meta-analysis

摘要：We aim to summarize the existing evidence to compare the surgical outcomes of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB) and laparoscopic RYGB (LRYGB) and to determine if these two procedures are equivalent. Literature searches were conducted by a comprehensive search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Nineteen articles met the inclusion criteria for this review. The robotic and laparoscopic procedures had no significant differences in hospitalization time, conversion, reoperation, readmission, and postoperative complications. However, RRYGB was associated with a longer mean operative time. RRYGB was not found to be superior to LRYGB. Future studies that would report detailed meaningful postoperative outcomes, such as complications and percentage of excess weight loss, are required to determine any further differences in the efficacy between RRYGB and LRYGB.