详细信息

甘肃乌拉尔甘草野生与栽培品内生菌的分离及鉴定     被引量:8

Identification and Separation of Endophytes in Wild and Cultivated Glycyrrhiza Uralensis from Gansu Province

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:甘肃乌拉尔甘草野生与栽培品内生菌的分离及鉴定

英文题名:Identification and Separation of Endophytes in Wild and Cultivated Glycyrrhiza Uralensis from Gansu Province

作者:邓毅[1];王艳[1];丁仁伟[1];杨志军[1];张艳萍[2]

第一作者:邓毅

机构:[1]甘肃中医学院,甘肃兰州730000;[2]甘肃中医学院附属医院

第一机构:甘肃中医药大学

年份:2012

卷号:25

期号:11

起止页码:8

中文期刊名:西部中医药

外文期刊名:Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

收录:CSTPCD

基金:甘肃省中医药管理局项目(编号GZK-2010-9)

语种:中文

中文关键词:甘肃;乌拉尔甘草;野生栽培;内生细菌;内生真菌;分离纯化;种类鉴定

外文关键词:Gansu; Glycyrrhiza Uralensis; wild cultivation; endophytic bacteria; endophytic fungi; isolation and purification; species identification

摘要:目的:通过对甘肃乌拉尔甘草野生与栽培品内生菌的分离,对甘草同属不同品种内生菌的优势菌种进行初步鉴定,比较二者的生理活性差异。方法:采用NA、PDA培养基对甘草野生与栽培品内生菌进行分离和纯化,并以分离频率比较判断各自优势菌种。结果:野生甘草分离到内生细菌65株,内生真菌7株,优势菌种为青霉菌属和曲霉属;栽培甘草分离到内生细菌54株,内生真菌6株,优势菌种为青霉菌属;野生与栽培甘草的内生真菌分属于6个属,相同的有5个属,不同的2个属为丝核菌属和木霉属。结论:野生与栽培甘草具有相趋同数量和种类的内生细菌与内生真菌,但二者内生真菌的菌属及优势菌种存在明显差异。
Objective: To compare the differences of biological activity between wild and cultivated glycyrrhiza uralensis through the isolation of endophytes and identification on dominant bacteria from endophytes of different species in the same genera.Method: Endophytes from wild and cultivated GanCao were isolated and purified with NA and PDA base.The dominant bacteria were compared and judged with frequency separation.Result: All 65 strains of endophytic bacteria and seven strains of endophytic fungi were isolated from wild GanCao,the dominant bacteria were penicillium spp and monillales;54 strains of endophytic bacteria and six strains of endophytic fungi were isolated from cultivated GanCao,the dominant bacteria were penicillium spp;endophytic fungi isolated from wild and cultivated GanCao were in the six genera,there were five same genera,two different genera were rhizoctonia and trichoderma.Conclusion: Wild and cultivated GanCao have almost the same amount and kinds of endophytic bacteria and fungi,but there exists remarkable difference in genera and dominant bacteria of endophtic fungi in both.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©甘肃中医药大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-8 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心