文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Confronting the economic burden of diabetes: Can TCM DRG payment reform in China offer a viable solution? Insights from empirical research in Western China

作者：Chen, Meng-en[1,2,3];Hou, Haojia[3];Yang, Jingyu[3];Kong, Fanxin[4];Cong, Tianzhen[5];Zhang, Qian[6]

第一作者：Chen, Meng-en

通信作者：Zhang, Q[1]

机构：[1]Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Sch Tradit Chinese Med, Beijing, Peoples R China;[2]Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Sch Management, Beijing, Peoples R China;[3]Gansu Univ Chinese Med, Sch Hlth Management, Lanzhou, Peoples R China;[4]Hlth Commiss Gansu Prov, Gansu Hlth & Populat Dev Res Ctr, Lanzhou, Peoples R China;[5]Jining Med Univ, Jining, Peoples R China;[6]Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Clin Res Ctr Canc, Sichuan Canc Ctr, Sichuan Canc Hosp & Inst,Dept Gen Affairs, Chengdu, Peoples R China

第一机构：Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Sch Tradit Chinese Med, Beijing, Peoples R China

通信机构：[1]corresponding author), Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Clin Res Ctr Canc, Sichuan Canc Ctr, Sichuan Canc Hosp & Inst,Dept Gen Affairs, Chengdu, Peoples R China.

年份：2026

卷号：14

外文期刊名：FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH

收录：;Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-105034201097);WOS:【SSCI(收录号:WOS:001724170200001)，SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:001724170200001)】；

语种：英文

外文关键词：diabetes; DRG; hospitalization costs; length of stay; TCM

摘要：Background: Diabetes poses a major global public health challenge, carrying significant economic implications worldwide. In China, the ongoing implementation of Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) payment reforms, especially within Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) contexts, is critical in improving diabetes patient care and alleviating associated economic burdens. Methods: We examined 2,804 hospitalized diabetes patients at Qingyang City Hospital of Chinese Medicine in Gansu Province from 2017 to 2022. Using univariate and interrupted time-series (ITS) analyses, we compared patient visit data, healthcare-related costs, and length of stay pre- and post-DRG reform. Results: Following DRG reform at Qingyang City Hospital of Chinese Medicine, significant differences were noted in patients' age, visit times, type of diabetes, complications and comorbidities, use of Chinese medicine diagnostic and therapeutic equipment, and surgeries and operations, compared with the pre-reform period (p < 0.05). Post-reform, there was a noteworthy decrease in hospitalization cost and Western medicine cost, and TCM treatment cost (p < 0.05), while Chinese medicine cost remained stable but the overall cost level increased (p > 0.05). Additionally, there was a slight reduction in length of stay after the reform, although this change did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Conclusion: DRG reform significantly reduces hospitalization cost, TCM treatment cost, and Western medicine cost for diabetes patients in TCM hospitals. However, its impact on Chinese medicine cost and length of stay is limited. Future reforms should capitalize on the unique strengths of TCM treatment, enhance cost management strategies, and focus on minimizing length of stay and medical expenses while ensuring effective patient care.