文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：温通针法靶向透刺治疗慢性前列腺炎临床观察

英文题名：Clinical observation on warming-promoting needling and target penetrating needling method for chronic prostatitis

作者：赵耀东[1];韩豆瑛[2]

第一作者：赵耀东

机构：[1]甘肃中医学院针灸推拿系,兰州730000;[2]甘肃省康复中心医院

第一机构：甘肃中医药大学针灸推拿学院

年份：2013

卷号：33

期号：10

起止页码：897

中文期刊名：中国针灸

外文期刊名：Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion

收录：MEDLINE(收录号：24377219);CSTPCD;;Scopus;北大核心:【北大核心2011】；CSCD:【CSCD2013_2014】；PubMed;

语种：中文

中文关键词：慢性前列腺炎;针刺方法;温通针法;靶向透刺

外文关键词：chronic prostatitis; acupuncture method; warming-promoting needling; target penetrating needling method

摘要：目的:探寻针灸治疗慢性前列腺炎的较好方法。方法:将90例慢性前列腺炎患者随机分为温通针法靶向透刺治疗组(温透组)、常规针刺组(针刺组)和药物对照组(药物组),各30例。温透组取中极、关元、气海、大横、气冲为主穴,行温通针法,使针感靶向透达到前列腺局部,每天1次;针刺组主穴与温透组相同,采用常规针刺补泻法;药物组常规服用前列康。以上3组均以10天为一疗程,疗程间隔3天,治疗3个疗程后统计疗效。结果:3种方法对慢性前列腺炎均有疗效,温通组的总有效率为93.3%(28/30),明显优于针刺组的73.3%(22/30,P<0.05)和药物组的63.3%(19/30,P<0.01)。温通组的治愈率为80.0%(24/30),明显优于针刺组的46.6%(14/30)和药物组的30.0%(9/30,均P<0.001)。结论:温通针法靶向透刺治疗慢性前列腺炎的临床疗效明显优于常规针刺和前列康药物治疗,其疗效肯定,效果独特。
Objective To explore a more optimal therapy for chronic prostatitis. Methods Ninty cases of chro- nic prostitis were randomized into a warming-promoting needling and target penetrating needling method group （WT group）, a conventional acupuncture group（CA group） and a medication group （M group）, 30 cases in each one. The warming-promoting needling method was applied at Zhongji （CV 3）, Guanyuan （CV 4）, Qihai （CV 6）, Daheng （SP 15）, Qichong （ST 30） in the WT group, the needling sensation was targeted towards the prostate, once daily; in CA group, conventional acupuncture was applied at the same acupoints of WT group; Qianliekang tablets was prescribed to the M group. For the 3 groups, 10 treatment made one session and 3 days as an interval, the efficacy was evaluated after 3 sessions. Results All of the 3 methods were effective for chronic prostitis, the total effective rate in the WT group was 93.3 % （28/30）, which was superior to 73.3 % （22/30, P〈0.05） in the CA group and 63.3%（19/30,P〈0.01） in the M group. The curative rate in the WT group was 80.0% （24/30）, which was superior to 46. 6; （14/30） in the CA group and 30.0% （9/30） in the M group（both P〈0. 001）. Conclusion The warming-promoting needling and target penetrating needling method achieve superior efficacy on chronic prostatitis as compared with conventional acupuncture and Qianliekang tablets.