文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：金铃子散分煎与合煎药效学的比较研究

英文题名：Comparative Study on Anti-inflammatory and Analgesic Action of Ingredient-separated Decoction and Ingredient-mingled Decoction of Jinlingzisan

作者：李沛清[1];刘喜平[1];席时燕[1]

第一作者：李沛清

机构：[1]甘肃中医学院

第一机构：甘肃中医药大学

年份：2005

卷号：12

期号：9

起止页码：19

中文期刊名：中国中医药信息杂志

外文期刊名：Chinese Journal of Information on TCM

收录：CSTPCD;;CSCD:【CSCD_E2011_2012】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：金铃子散;抗炎;镇痛;药效学

外文关键词：Jinlingzisan; anti-inflammatory; analgesic

摘要：目的观察金铃子散抗炎镇痛作用,比较金铃子散分煎与合煎液的药效差异。方法建立二甲苯致炎和醋酸所致小鼠腹腔毛细血管通透性增高模型,并通过醋酸所致扭体法、热板法致痛实验,比较金铃子散分煎与合煎液的药效。结果金铃子散分煎与合煎都能明显减少小鼠醋酸所致扭体反应次数,提高小鼠痛阈值,具有良好的镇痛作用,且呈现剂量依赖性;分煎与合煎都有明显的抗炎作用,并能明显降低醋酸致小鼠腹腔毛细血管的通透性增高。结论金铃子散有显著的抗炎镇痛作用,其分煎与合煎液在抗炎镇痛方面无明显差异。
Objective To observe the effects of anti-inflammatory and analgesic of Jinlingzisan and compare the difference of Ingredient-separated Decoction and Ingredient-mingled Decoction of Jinlingzisan. Methods The mice inflammatory model were established by dimethyl benzene （auricle smear method）, and the model of vascular permeability caused by acetic acid. Acetic acid test tall-flick and hot plate test were used to compare analgesic action of Jinlingzisan. Result The number of writhes induced by acetic acid, the ear edema induced by dimethyl benzene and the increased vascular permeability caused by acetic acid are all significantly suppressed by Ingredient- separated Decoction and Ingredient-mingled Decoction of Jinlingzisan. Conclusion Ingredient- separated Decoction and Ingredient-mingled Decoction of Jinlingzisan all had the effects of anti- inflammatory and analgesic, they had not significant difffrences.