文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：基于循证制订有中医特色的针刺系统评价/Meta分析报告指南的方法学探讨

英文题名：Based on evidence to establish reporting guidelines for TCM-featured acupuncture systematic reviews/Meta-analysis:a methodology discussion

作者：王亚军[1,2];刘雅莉[3];杨克虎[3];郭义[4]

第一作者：王亚军

机构：[1]甘肃中医学院针灸推拿系;[2]中国中医科学院基础理论研究所;[3]兰州大学循证医学中心基础医学院;[4]天津中医药大学针灸学院

第一机构：甘肃中医药大学针灸推拿学院

年份：2014

卷号：34

期号：12

起止页码：1231

中文期刊名：中国针灸

外文期刊名：Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion

收录：CSTPCD;;Scopus;北大核心:【北大核心2011】；CSCD:【CSCD2013_2014】；PubMed;

基金：国家自然基金面上项目:81373882

语种：中文

中文关键词：循证;针刺;系统评价;报告指南

外文关键词：evidence-based;acupuncture;systematic review;reporting guidelines

摘要：已有的系统评价/Meta分析(SRs/MAs)报告指南无法满足临床实践及科研的要求,因此提出基于循证制订有中医特色的针刺系统评价/Meta分析报告指南的方法思路。通过文献分析,依据循证理念,对制订有中医特色的针刺系统评价/Meta分析报告指南方法学提出了初步设想。提出以共识法为主要研究手段,并在专家遴选、制订达成的共识中,增加中国学者的比例,充分体现我国针灸研究者意见,并通过实践应用验证,最终形成具有中医、针灸本土特色的针刺SRs/MAs报告指南标准。
Existing reporting guidelines for systematic reviews/Meta-analysis（SRs/MAs）cannot meet the requirements of clinical practice and scientific research,so based on evidence,methods and thoughts on establishing reporting guidelines for TCM-featured acupuncture systematic reviews/Meta-analysis were proposed.Through literature analysis,according to evidence-based principle,preliminary ideas on methodology of establishing reporting guidelines for TCM-featured acupuncture systematic reviews/Meta-analysis were proposed.With consensus as one main research method,it was proposed that in the consensus that was selected and established by experts,the proportion of Chinese scholars should be increased to fully declare the opinions of Chinese acupuncturists,and by verification of practice and application,the reporting guidelines for TCM-featured acupuncture systematic reviews/Meta-analysis can be finally made.