详细信息
基于12种微量元素评价甘肃不同产区红芪质量 被引量:20
Study on Quality Evaluation of Hedysari Radix from Different Producing Areas in Gansu Province Based on the Contents of 12 Trace Elements
文献类型:期刊文献
中文题名:基于12种微量元素评价甘肃不同产区红芪质量
英文题名:Study on Quality Evaluation of Hedysari Radix from Different Producing Areas in Gansu Province Based on the Contents of 12 Trace Elements
作者:李成义[1];强正泽[1];王燕[1];王明伟[1];李硕[1]
第一作者:李成义
机构:[1]甘肃中医药大学药学院,甘肃兰州730000
第一机构:甘肃中医药大学药学院(西北中藏药协同创新中心办公室)
年份:2016
卷号:23
期号:6
起止页码:92
中文期刊名:中国中医药信息杂志
外文期刊名:Chinese Journal of Information on Traditional Chinese Medicine
收录:CSTPCD;;CSCD:【CSCD_E2015_2016】;
基金:国家自然科学基金(81360621)
语种:中文
中文关键词:不同产区;红芪;微量元素;质量评价
外文关键词:different producing areas; Hedysari Radix; trace elements; quality evaluation
摘要:目的以甘肃不同产区红芪为研究对象,红芪中微量元素含量为评价指标,评价甘肃不同产区红芪质量,为红芪质量标准的制定提供参考依据。方法采用火焰原子吸收分光光度法测定甘肃不同产区红芪中铁、铜、钙、锰、锌、镁、铬、钴、钠、锂、镍、钾微量元素含量,应用SPSS21.0软件对数据进行因子分析,采用主成分提取公因子,建立质量综合排名分析函数。结果提取了3个公因子F1、F2、F3,质量评价函数为Y=0.657F1+0.119F2+0.089F3;铬、锂、钴、铜、锌、铁、镁是影响红芪质量的特征性元素;以微量元素评价红芪质量时,野生红芪的质量优于栽培红芪的质量,质量排名结果与陇南为红芪主产区相符,定西地区部分样品质量较优。结论以微量元素评价红芪质量表征了不同产区红芪质量之间的差异性,结果较为合理。
Objective To evaluate the quality of Hedysari Radix from different producing areas in Gansu Provinceby setting Hedysari Radix from different producing areas in Gansu Province as study subjects and trace elements inHedysari Radix as evaluation indexes; To provide the references for establishment of the quality standards of HedysariRadix. Methods The content of Fe, Cu, Ca, Mn, Zn, Mg, Cr, Co, Na, Li, Ni and K in Hedysari Radix were detected byusing flame atomic absorbption method. Data were analyzed by the factor analysis conducted by SPSS21.0 software.The common factors were extracted by principal component and analytic function for quality comprehensive rankingwas established. Results Three common factors were extracted, namely F1, F2, and F3. The quality function wasY=0.657F1+0.119F2+0.089F3. Cr, Li, Co, Cu, Zn, Fe and Mg were the characteristic trace elements of Hedysari Radixthat could affect the quality of Hedysari Radix. When the quality of Hedysari Radix was evaluated by the contents oftrace elements, the quality of wild Hedysari Radix were better than cultivated Hedysari Radix and the quality rankwas consistent with the idea that Longnan is the main producing area of Hedysari Radix. The quality of samples fromDingxi area was better. Conclusion The quality evaluation of Hedysari Radix based on trace elements shows thedifferences in Hedysari Radix from different producing areas in Gansu Province and the results are relativelyreasonable.
参考文献:
正在载入数据...