文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：公共健康视角下我国电子烟监管政策文本量化研究

英文题名：Quantitative research on the texts of China's e-cigarette regulatory policies:from the perspective of public health

作者：刘晖[1];王兵[2];寇丽圆[2];张阿雲[2];董强玲[1];王乐乐[1]

第一作者：刘晖

机构：[1]甘肃中医药大学卫生管理学院,兰州730000;[2]甘肃中医药大学公共卫生学院,兰州730000

第一机构：甘肃中医药大学

年份：2024

卷号：14

期号：2

起止页码：25

中文期刊名：中国医疗管理科学

外文期刊名：Chinese Journal Of Medical Management Sciences

基金：甘肃省科技计划项目(23JRZA462);甘肃省高校教师创新基金项目(2023A-089)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：电子烟;公共健康;政策工具;政策分析

外文关键词：e-Cigarettes;Public health;Policy tools;Policy analysis

摘要：目的在推进健康中国战略的背景下,从政策工具视角出发,分析2017年11月至2022年10月间我国电子烟监管相关政策工具使用情况,为后续电子烟政策的调整和优化提供参考。方法构建政策工具与电子烟行业二维分析框架,运用定量分析法对我国电子烟监管相关政策进行归纳,使用NVivo 11软件对政策文本进行编码整理和内容分析。结果共纳入了29份国家层面出台的电子烟监管政策文件,累计编码530条,其中环境型政策工具占54.53%,需求型政策工具占28.49%,供给型政策工具占16.98%。从电子烟行业的维度来看,电子烟生产企业在政策工具中被提及的频率最高,电子烟批发企业次之,电子烟零售商最低。结论充分认识政策工具的优势,优化政策配置以提高政策工具整体结构均衡性。适当减少环境型政策工具的同时重视评估机制的作用;着力增加示范项目和科普宣传类需求型政策工具的使用;加大基础设施建设、技术标准、资金投入等类型的供给型政策工具出台力度。在有效维护人群健康的同时,拉动电子烟行业可持续发展。
Objective In the context of promoting the Healthy China strategy,this paper analyzes the use of e-cigarette regulatory policy tools in China from November 2017 to October 2022 from the perspective of policy tools,so as to provide reference for the adjustment and optimization of subsequent e-cigarette policies.Methods A two-dimensional analysis framework composed of policy tools and e-cigarette industry was constructed.Quantitative analysis was used to summarize the e-cigarette supervision policies in China,and the NVivo 11 software was used to code and sort out the policy texts and analyze the content.Results A total of 29 national e-cigarette regulatory policy documents were included,with a total of 530 codes,of which 54.53%were environment-based policy tools,28.49%were demand-based policy tools,and 16.98%were supply-based policy tools.From the perspective of the e-cigarette industry,e-cigarette manufacturers were mentioned most frequently in policy tools,followed by e-cigarette wholesale companies,with e-cigarette retailers being the lowest.Conclusion With an adequate understanding of the advantages of policy tools,the policy allocation should be optimized to improve the overall structural balance of policy tools.While appropriately reducing environmentbased policy tools,we should pay ttention to the role of assessment mechanisms,increase the use of demand-based policy tools(e.g.demonstration projects and science popularization),and increase the adoption of supply-oriented policy tools(e.g.,infrastructure construction,technical standards,and capital investment).In the premise of maintaining the population health,policies may also be developed to promote the sustainable development of the e-cigarette industry.