文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：中医经验思维的原理、局限性及纠误方法探讨

英文题名：Principles,Limitations,and Error-Correction Methods of Traditional Chinese Medicine's Empirical Thinking

作者：唐文[1];王洋[1];张磊[2];童康[1];王志斌[1];陈斌斌[1];刘瑞芳[1];李灿东[1]

第一作者：唐文

机构：[1]福建中医药大学中医证研究基地,福建省350122;[2]甘肃中医药大学基础医学院

第一机构：福建中医药大学中医证研究基地,福建省350122

年份：2023

卷号：64

期号：20

起止页码：2053

中文期刊名：中医杂志

外文期刊名：Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

收录：CSTPCD;;北大核心:【北大核心2020】；CSCD:【CSCD2023_2024】；

基金：国家中医药管理局第二届全国名中医传承工作室建设项目(国中医药办人教函[2022]245号)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：经验思维;思维原理;控制论;中医思维;思维局限性

外文关键词：empirical thinking;thinking principle;cybernetics;traditional Chinese medicine thinking;thinking limitations

摘要：从控制论的角度探讨中医经验思维的基本原理,包括经验的输入与储存、经验的提取与活化、经验的组合与再造、基于经验的判断与决策、经验的评估与反馈。基于经验思维的原理分析其在临床应用中可能存在的局限性,主要表现为个人性、表面性、保守性、重共性而轻个性、思维惯性五个方面,并从理性思维与经验思维相结合、强化反馈机制与超验修正、个性化与量质结合、经验思维下隐性知识的管理与传承四个角度探讨临床纠误的策略与方法。
From the perspective of cybernetics,this study investigated the fundamental principles of empirical thinking in traditional Chinese medicine,encompassing six stages,including experience input and storage,experi?ence extraction and activation,experience combination and reconstruction,judgment and decision-making based on experience,and experience evaluation and feedback.The potential limitations of empirical thinking in clinical appli?cations were analyzed,mainly manifested as individuality,superficiality,conservatism,prioritizing commonality over individuality,and cognitive inertia.To overcome these limitations,this paper also explored strategies and methods for clinical error-correction from four points,i.e.the integration of rational and empirical thinking,the reinforcement of feedback mechanisms and transcendent correction,the integration of individualization and quantity-quality balance,and the management and transference of tacit knowledge under empirical thinking.