文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Acupuncture for treatment of anxiety, an overview of systematic reviews

作者：Li, Meixuan[1,2,3,4];Xing, Xin[5];Yao, Liang[6];Li, Xiuxia[1,2,3,4];He, Wenbo[1];Wang, Meng[1];Li, Huijuan[1,2,3,4];Wang, Xiaoqin[2,3,4];Xun, Yangqin[1,2,3,4];Yan, Peijing[7];Lu, Zhenxing[8];Zhou, Biao[8];Yang, Xinmin[9];Yang, Kehu[1,2,3,4,7]

第一作者：Li, Meixuan

通信作者：Yang, KH[1];Yang, XM[2]

机构：[1]Lanzhou Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[2]Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Sch Basic Med Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[3]Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Social Sci Res Ctr, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[4]Key Lab Evidence Based Med & Knowledge Translat G, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[5]Gansu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[6]Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Chinese Med Fac, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China;[7]Gansu Prov Hosp, Inst Clin Res & Evidence Based Med, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[8]Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 1, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[9]Chinese PLA Hosp, Dept Endoscop Surg, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China

第一机构：Lanzhou Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China

通信机构：[1]corresponding author), Lanzhou Univ, 199 Donggang West Rd, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China;[2]corresponding author), Chinese PLA Hosp Rd, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.

年份：2019

卷号：43

起止页码：247

外文期刊名：COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE

收录：;Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85061800483);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000465062400036)】；

基金：Supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (16LZUJBWTD013, 18LZUJBWZX006): Evidence - based sociology research.

语种：英文

外文关键词：Acupuncture; Anxiety; Overview

摘要：Purpose: To evaluate the methodological quality and summarize evidence of important outcomes of systematic reviews (SRs)/Meta analyses (MM) of acupuncture for anxiety. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search for SRs/MAs in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Chinese Biomedical Databases (CBM), Wanfang database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) until November 30, 2018. Three reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the reviews according to the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2), the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to rate the quality of evidence. In the pre-experiment, we used the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess reviewer agreement, the ICC value for overall score was 0.978. Results: Ten reviews were included. The assessment results of AMSTAR-2 showed that the methodological quality of all included studies was critically low. The lowest score were item "provide a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions" and item "report sources of funding for the included studies", none of studies provided information about the above two items, followed by the "providing a priori design" item with only two (20%) studies conforming to this item. For GRADE, of the 7 outcomes, high quality evidence was provided in only 1 (14.3%), moderate in 2 (28.6.7%), and low in 4 (57.1%). Conclusion: Although most of the included reviews indicated that acupuncture group was more effective than control group in the treatment of anxiety, more importantly, the methodological quality of the included reviews and the quality of evidence were low. More high-quality evidence is needed to determine whether acupuncture is more effective than other treatments.