文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist

作者：Wang, Xiaoqin[1,2,3,4];Chen, Yaolong[1,2,3,4];Liu, Yali[1,2,3,4];Yao, Liang[5];Estill, Janne[6,7];Bian, Zhaoxiang[5];Wu, Taixiang[8];Shang, Hongcai[9];Lee, Myeong Soo[10];Wei, Dang[11];Tian, Jinhui[1,2,3,4];Ma, Bin[1,2,3,4];Wang, Yongfeng[12];Tian, Guihua[9];Yang, Kehu[1,2,3,4]

第一作者：Wang, Xiaoqin

通信作者：Chen, YL[1];Yang, KH[1]

机构：[1]Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Sch Basic Med Sci, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China;[2]Lanzhou Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Evidence Based Social Sci Res Ctr, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China;[3]Key Lab Evidence Based Med & Knowledge Translat G, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China;[4]WHO Collaborating Ctr Guideline Implementat & Kno, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China;[5]Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Clin Div, Sch Chinese Med, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China;[6]Univ Geneva, Inst Global Hlth, Geneva, Switzerland;[7]Univ Genewa, Inst Math Stat & Actuarial Sci, Geneva, Switzerland;[8]Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Chinese Cochrane Ctr, Chinese Evidence Based Med Ctr, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China;[9]Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Dongzhimen Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China;[10]Korea Inst Oriental Med, Daejeon, South Korea;[11]Karolinska Inst, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Stockholm, Sweden;[12]Gansu Univ Chinese Med, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China

第一机构：Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Sch Basic Med Sci, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China

通信机构：[1]corresponding author), Lanzhou Univ, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Sch Basic Med Sci, Lanzhou, Gansu, Peoples R China.

年份：2019

卷号：19

期号：1

外文期刊名：BMC COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE

收录：;Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85070697154);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000480527200001)】；

基金：This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program, ID: 81373882) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (16LZUJBWTD013, 18LZUJBWZX006): Evidence-based Social Sciences Research. The funders had no role in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report, and decision to submit the article for publication.

语种：英文

外文关键词：PRISMA; Acupuncture intervention; Systematic review

摘要：Background Acupuncture is widely used worldwide, and systematic reviews on acupuncture are increasingly being published. Although acupuncture systematic reviews share several essential elements with other systematic reviews, some essential information for the application of acupuncture is not covered by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Considering this, we aimed to develop an extension of the PRISMA statement for acupuncture systematic reviews. Methods We used the PRISMA statement as a starting point, and conducted this study referring to the development strategy recommended by the EQUATOR network. The initial items were collected through a wide survey among evidence users and a review of relevant studies. We conducted a three-round Delphi survey and one-day face-to-face meeting to select items and formulate the checklist. After the consensus meeting, we drafted the manuscript (including the checklist) and sent it to our advisory experts for comments, following which the checklist was refined and circulated to a group of acupuncture systematic review authors for pilot test. We also selected a sample of acupuncture systematic reviews published in 2017 to test the checklist. Results A checklist of five new sub-items (including sub items) and six modified items was formulated, involving content related to title, rationale, eligibility criteria, literature search, data extraction, and study characteristics. We clarified the rationales of the items and provided examples for each item for additional guidance. Conclusion The PRISMA for Acupuncture checklist is developed for improving the reporting of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions.