文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：中药灌肠和口服2种给药途径治疗慢性盆腔炎的文献评价

英文题名：Systemic Review of Treatment for Chronic Pelvic Inflammatory Disease by TCM Enema and Oral Administration of TCM

作者：文惠方[1,2];任芳[1,3];徐厚谦[1];吴红彦[1];胡继宏[1]

第一作者：文惠方

机构：[1]甘肃中医学院;[2]兰州大学第二附属医院;[3]金昌市第一人民医院内科

第一机构：甘肃中医药大学

年份：2014

卷号：27

期号：2

起止页码：76

中文期刊名：西部中医药

外文期刊名：Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine

收录：CSTPCD

语种：中文

中文关键词：盆腔炎,慢性;中药灌肠;中药口服;随机对照实验;系统评价;Meta分析;文献评价

外文关键词：pelvic inflammatory disease, chronic; TCM enema; TCM oral administration;randomized controlled trials; systematic review; Meta analysis; literature evaluation

摘要：目的:系统评价慢性盆腔炎(CPID)中药灌肠与中药口服两种给药途径的疗效优势。方法:计算机检索Cochrane图书馆临床对照实验库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、中国学术期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库,检索相关学位论文及所获文献的参考文献,收集中药灌肠与中药口服治疗慢性盆腔炎的随机或半随机对照实验。结果:共纳入6个随机对照实验(RCT),共计498例CPID患者。大部分实验方法学质量较低且样本含量小。Meta分析结果显示中药灌肠组的总疗效优于中药口服组。结论:中药灌肠治疗慢性盆腔炎的疗效优于中药口服。
Objective： To evaluate the advantages of treating chronic pelvic inflammatory disease （CPID） by TCM enema and oral administration systematically. Methods： All randomized or semi-randomized controlled trials of TCM enema and oral administration in treating CPID were collected from clinical controlled trials database of Cochrane library, MEDL1NE, EMBASE, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang database, the reference of related dissertations and the obtained literature with computer. Results： Altogether six RCTs were included and 498 patients involved. Most of the trials were of low quality and with small sampling. The results of Meta analysis showed that TCM enema group was superior to TCM oral administration group in total effects. Conclusion： Clinical effects of TCM enema are superior to these of oral TCM in treating CPID.