详细信息
传统保健体育训练对大学生心理健康的影响 被引量:4
The influence of traditional health care sports training on university students' mental health
文献类型:期刊文献
中文题名:传统保健体育训练对大学生心理健康的影响
英文题名:The influence of traditional health care sports training on university students' mental health
作者:江陆平[1];罗喜教[1];李希斌[1]
第一作者:江陆平
机构:[1]甘肃中医药大学人文与社会科学学院医学心理学教研室,兰州730000
第一机构:甘肃中医药大学人文与外国语学院(甘肃中医药文化传承发展中心办公室)
年份:2016
卷号:37
期号:8
起止页码:1187
中文期刊名:中国学校卫生
外文期刊名:Chinese Journal of School Health
收录:CSTPCD;;北大核心:【北大核心2014】;
语种:中文
中文关键词:干预性研究;精神卫生;体育运动;学生,医科
外文关键词:Intervention studies; Mental health; Sports; Students; medical
摘要:目的了解传统保健体育训练对大学生心理健康的影响,为传统保健体育项目在高等院校的推广提供参考。方法以在甘肃中医药大学招募愿意参加研究的352名大学生为被试,采用症状自评量表(SCL-90)、特质社会适应量表(TCSQ)以及大五人格量表(NEO-PI-R)对参加传统保健体育训练的实验组和未参加训练的对照组大学生进行前、后测评。结果实验组大学生人际关系、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、精神病性、躯体化、强迫症、恐怖因子得分训练前后差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05);对照组大学生除焦虑外(P<0.05),其余各因子得分训练前后差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。实验组大学生消极应对、积极应对得分训练前后差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.01),而对照组大学生训练前后差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。实验组大学生神经质(N)、严谨性(M)、外向性(E)、顺同性(G)得分训练前后差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05);对照组大学生5项人格特质因子得分训练前后差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。结论传统保健体育训练对优化大学生心理健康状况具有明显的促进作用。高等医学院校可以充分发挥学科优势,大力推广传统保健体育训练。
Objective To explore the influence of traditional health care sports training for university students mental health,and to provide references for the traditional health care sports promotion. Methods The study is based on a survey of 352 university students assessed by the SCL-90,TCSQ and NEO-PI-R for the experimental and the control group respectively. Results There are extremely significant differences( P〈0.05) in the factor points, such as interpersonal relationship, depression, anxiety,hostility and psychotic, and significant difference( P〈0.05) in the factor points, such as somatization, obsessive-compulsive disorder, terror and paranoia for the experimental group students. However, for the control group, the factors points have no significant difference( P〉0.05) except the anxiety factor( P〈0. 05). The factor points, negative coping and positive coping, have extremely significant differences( P〈0. 01) for the experimental group students, but none significant difference( P〉0. 05) for the control group. For the experimental group students, there are extremely significant differences( P〈0.01) in the factor points of neurotic( N)and conscientious( M), and significant difference( P〈0.05) in the factor points of extraversion( E), agreeableness( G). But these five personality factors have no significant difference( P〉0.05) for the control groups. Conclusions Traditional health care sports training is more suitable for the mental health of university students. Medical colleges and university should rely on subject superiority, energetically promote the traditional health care sports training, and exploit it as a psychological intervention technique.
参考文献:
正在载入数据...