详细信息

甘肃不同产地红芪中微量元素的含量测定     被引量:6

Quantitative Determination of Trace Elements in Hedysari Radix from Different Places in Gansu Province

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:甘肃不同产地红芪中微量元素的含量测定

英文题名:Quantitative Determination of Trace Elements in Hedysari Radix from Different Places in Gansu Province

作者:李成义[1];强正泽[1];王明伟[1];李硕[1];肖文[1]

第一作者:李成义

机构:[1]甘肃中医药大学药学院,兰州730000

第一机构:甘肃中医药大学药学院(西北中藏药协同创新中心办公室)

年份:2016

卷号:22

期号:12

起止页码:54

中文期刊名:中国实验方剂学杂志

外文期刊名:Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae

收录:CSTPCD;;北大核心:【北大核心2014】;CSCD:【CSCD_E2015_2016】;

基金:国家自然科学基金项目(81360621)

语种:中文

中文关键词:不同产地;红芪;微量元素;含量测定;火焰原子吸收光谱法

外文关键词:different places in Gansu province; Hedysari Radix; trace elements; quantitative determination; flame atomic absorption spectrometry

摘要:目的:测定甘肃不同产地红芪中微量元素含量,为有效控制其质量提供基础性数据。方法:利用湿消化法处理样品,采用火焰原子吸收光谱法测定不同产地红芪样品中铁,铜,钙,锰,锌,镁,镉,铬,钴,钠,锂,镍,钾元素含量,并进行方差分析和聚类分析。结果:红芪中钙、钾、锌、锰、钴、锂、铬、镁、铜、铁、钠、镍的含量范围为2.770 1~3.411 6,16.695 9~18.753 5,2.732 2~6.482 0,0.797 6~0.994 4,0.067 0~0.071 6,0.341 2~0.423 0,0.059 9~0.068 9,88.725 8~99.263 5,0.185 6~0.467 3,0.865 9~2.607 1,20.758 5~27.021 8,0.196 6~0.232 4μg·g^(^(-1))。其中镉元素未检出,红芪中各元素平均含量高低顺序为镁>钠>钾>锌>钙>铁>锰>锂>铜>镍>钴>铬>镉;32个产地红芪中铁、钾、锌、镍、钠、镁、锰、铬元素含量之间均具有显著性(P<0.05)差异,而铜、钙、锂、钴4种元素的含量之间没有显著性差异;32份样品聚为4类,大多数栽培红芪聚第一类,野生红芪聚为第二类。结论:红芪中微量元素含量的差异性不仅与产地有关,而且与红芪是野生品、栽培品有关。
Objective: To determine the contents of trace elements in Hedysari Radix from different places in Gansu province,and provide reliable method for the effective quality control of Hedysari Radix. Method:Wet digestion method was used to process the samples and flame atomic absorption spectrometry was used to determine the contents of Fe,Cu,Ca,Mn,Zn,Mg,Cd,Cr,Co,Na,Li,Ni and K in Hedysari Radix. The analysis of variance and clustering analysis were applied to analyze the results. Result: The elemental contents in Hedysari Radix were as follows: Fe( 0. 865 9-2. 607 1 μg·g-1),Cu( 0. 185 6-0. 467 3 μg·g-1),Ca( 2. 770 1-3. 411 6 μg·g-1),Mn( 0. 797 6-0. 994 4 μg·g-1),Zn( 2. 732 2-6. 482 0 μg·g-1),Mg( 88. 725 8-99. 263 5μg·g-1),Ni( 0. 196 6-0. 232 4 μg·g-1),Cr( 0. 059 9-0. 068 9 μg·g-1),Co( 0. 067 0-0. 071 6 μg·g-1),Na( 20. 758 5-27. 021 8 μg·g-1),Li( 0. 341 2-0. 423 0 μg·g-1),K( 16. 695 9-18. 753 5 μg·g-1). Cd was not detected in Hedysari Radix. The order for average elemental contents was Mg〉 Na〉 K〉 Zn 〉 Ca 〉 Fe〉 Mn〉 Li〉 Cu〉 Ni〉 Co〉 Cr 〉 Cd from high to low. There was significant difference in contents of Fe,K,Zn,Ni,Na,Mg,Mn and Cr( P〈0. 05),but the difference was not significant in contents of Cu,Ca,Li and Co in Hedysari Radix from 32 places. The results of clustering analysis showed that 32 samples were clustered into four different groups.The majority of cultivated Hedysari Radix samples were classified into the first group,and wild Hedysari Radix samples were classified into the second group. Conclusion: The differences of trace elements content in Hedysari Radix are not only related to places,but also related to cultivated Hedysari Radix or wild Hedysari Radix.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©甘肃中医药大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-8 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心