详细信息
治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术在高龄患者中的临床疗效及风险评估
The risk assessment and clinical efficacy of elderly patients with biliary pancreatic disease treated with therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)
文献类型:期刊文献
中文题名:治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术在高龄患者中的临床疗效及风险评估
英文题名:The risk assessment and clinical efficacy of elderly patients with biliary pancreatic disease treated with therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)
作者:王兴胜[1];杨智慧[1];滕正青[1];屈红梅[1];巨煜华[1];刘海龙[1];张秀玉[1]
第一作者:王兴胜
机构:[1]甘肃中医药大学第三附属医院白银市第一人民医院消化科,甘肃白银730900
第一机构:甘肃中医药大学第二附属医院
年份:2020
卷号:10
期号:24
起止页码:14
中文期刊名:医药前沿
外文期刊名:Journal of Frontiers of Medicine
语种:中文
中文关键词:高龄患者;治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术;临床疗效;安全性评价
外文关键词:Elderly patients;Therapeutic ERCP;Clinical efficacy;Risk assessment
摘要:目的:探讨治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术在高龄患者中的临床效果,并评价其安全性。方法:选取我院2017年6月至2019年6月收治的208例治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)患者为研究对象,按照患者年龄大小分为高龄组(n=70)和低龄组(n=138),探讨两组患者的临床治疗效果和安全性。结果:治疗后低龄组较高龄组患者SAS和SDS评分显著下降(t=2.665,2.460;P<0.05),低龄组较高龄组患者炎症因子水平显著下降(t=2.441,2.158,2.065;P<0.05),高龄组患者住院时间较低龄组长(t=6.353,P<0.05),高龄组住院费用较低龄组花费高(t=10.265,P<0.05),临床疗效(99.27%VS 97.14%)和并发症发生率(2.16%VS 2.86%)比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.123,0.092;P>0.05)。结论:治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影术对高龄胰胆系统疾病患者临床效果显著,安全性较好。
Objective To risk assessment and clinical efficacy of elderly patients with biliary pancreatic disease treated with therapeutic ERCP.Methods From Jun.2017 to Jun.2019,208 cases of treated with therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)were divided into senior group(n=70)and young group(n=138),the clinical efficacy and security were analyzed.Results After treatment,the SAS and SDS scores of young group were significantly decreased(t=2.665,2.460,P<0.05).The level of inflammatory cytokines of young group were significantly decreased(t=2.441,2.158,2.065,P<0.05).The hospital stays of senior group were longer(t=6.353,P<0.05)and more expensive(t=10.265,P<0.05).The effect(99.27%VS 97.14%)and complication rate(2.16%VS 2.86%)of comparison of two groups had no significant difference(χ^2=3.123,0.092,P>0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of elderly patients with therapeutic ERCP is better and the safety is good.
参考文献:
正在载入数据...