文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：甘肃不同产地款冬花质量比较研究

英文题名：Comparative Study on Quality of TussUago fafara L.from Different Areas in Gansu Province

作者：吕培霖[1,2];兰云[3];侯嘉[1];李成义[1];牛永红[4]

第一作者：吕培霖

机构：[1]甘肃中医学院;[2]解放军第25医院;[3]兰州军区药品仪器检验所;[4]榆中县中医院

第一机构：甘肃中医药大学

年份：2008

卷号：11

期号：11

起止页码：1307

中文期刊名：中国药师

外文期刊名：China Pharmacist

收录：CSTPCD

语种：中文

中文关键词：款冬花;质量;比较研究

外文关键词：Tussilago fafara L; Quality ; Comparative study

摘要：目的:比较甘肃不同产地款冬花药材的质量。方法:按《中国药典》方法,测定不同产地的款冬花药材纯度;采用高效液相色谱法,测量样品的芦丁含量,色谱条件:甲醇-1%冰醋酸(36:64)作流动相,流速1.0ml·min^(-1),检测波长257 nm。结果:不同产地款冬花的纯度指标有明显差异。芦丁的线性范围0.109～0.545μg,r=0.996 7。平均回收率98.6%,RSD为1.2%。结论:测定结果能为款冬花药材质量评价提供依据。
Objective： To compare the qualtity of Tussilagofarfara L. from different areas in Gansu province. Method： The purity of Tussilago farfara L. from different regions was determined by using the method described in the Chinese Pharmacopeia. An HPLC method was employed to compare the Rutin contents of Tussilago faufara L. from different regions. The mobile phase consisted of methanol - 1.0% glacial acetic acid（36： 64） ,the flow rate was 1.0 ml .min^-1 ,the detective wavelength was at 257 nm. Result： The purity of Tussilagofarfara L from different places was quite different. The linear range of rutin was 0. 109 -0.545μg, r =0.996 7. The average recovery was 98.6% （RSD = 1.2% ）. Conclusion： These resu/ts can provide the science basis for quality standard of Tussilagofao fara L.