详细信息
MSCT常规增强与CTPA诊断肺栓塞的临床价值比较 被引量:2
Comparison of the Clinical Value of Conventional Enhancement of MSCT vs CTPA for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism
文献类型:期刊文献
中文题名:MSCT常规增强与CTPA诊断肺栓塞的临床价值比较
英文题名:Comparison of the Clinical Value of Conventional Enhancement of MSCT vs CTPA for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism
作者:曾俊杰[1];钟栩[1];王晨[1]
第一作者:曾俊杰
机构:[1]甘肃中医学院,甘肃兰州730000
第一机构:甘肃中医药大学
年份:2010
卷号:27
期号:12
起止页码:2207
中文期刊名:医学临床研究
外文期刊名:Journal of Clinical Research
收录:CSTPCD
语种:中文
中文关键词:肺栓塞/放射摄影术;体层摄影术,X线计算机
外文关键词:pulmonary embolism/RA; tomography,X-ray computed
摘要:【目的】观察多层螺旋CT肺部常规增强和CTPA在肺动脉栓塞诊断中的应用价值。[方法】搜集2009年3月至2010年2月常规增强CT扫描发现而临床未拟诊肺栓塞病例13例,对原始数据采用MPR技术常规三雏重建;两天内进行肺血管CT血管成像(CTA),对原始数据采用最大密度投影(MIP)、容积再现(VRT)及多平面重建(MPR)技术对肺动脉进行三维重建。【结果】常规增强CT发现13例肺栓塞,栓塞动脉107支;CTPA确诊9例,栓塞动脉139支。【结论】CTpA相对常规增强CT灵敏性更高,但后者仍有较高临床价值,CTPA确诊并非必需。
[Objective]To observe the clinical value of conventional enhancement of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) vs CTPA for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. [Methods]Thirty patients unsuspected of pulmonary embolism who were found by conventional enhanced-CT from March 2009 to January 2010 were collected. The conventional 3D-reconstruction was performed for the original data by using MPR technology. CTA of pulmonary vessel was performed in 2 days. MIP, VRT and MPR technology were used for the 3D-reconstruction of the original data of lung arteries. [Results] Thirteen cases of pulmonary embolism and 107 embolism arteries were found by conventional enhanced-CT. Nine cases of pulmonary embolism and 107 embolism arteries were confirmed by CTPA. [Conclusion] CTPA is more sensitive than conventional enhanced-CT, but the latter still has high clinical value. Therefore, CTPA is not so necessary.
参考文献:
正在载入数据...