详细信息

MSCT常规增强与CTPA诊断肺栓塞的临床价值比较     被引量:2

Comparison of the Clinical Value of Conventional Enhancement of MSCT vs CTPA for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:MSCT常规增强与CTPA诊断肺栓塞的临床价值比较

英文题名:Comparison of the Clinical Value of Conventional Enhancement of MSCT vs CTPA for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

作者:曾俊杰[1];钟栩[1];王晨[1]

第一作者:曾俊杰

机构:[1]甘肃中医学院,甘肃兰州730000

第一机构:甘肃中医药大学

年份:2010

卷号:27

期号:12

起止页码:2207

中文期刊名:医学临床研究

外文期刊名:Journal of Clinical Research

收录:CSTPCD

语种:中文

中文关键词:肺栓塞/放射摄影术;体层摄影术,X线计算机

外文关键词:pulmonary embolism/RA; tomography,X-ray computed

摘要:【目的】观察多层螺旋CT肺部常规增强和CTPA在肺动脉栓塞诊断中的应用价值。[方法】搜集2009年3月至2010年2月常规增强CT扫描发现而临床未拟诊肺栓塞病例13例,对原始数据采用MPR技术常规三雏重建;两天内进行肺血管CT血管成像(CTA),对原始数据采用最大密度投影(MIP)、容积再现(VRT)及多平面重建(MPR)技术对肺动脉进行三维重建。【结果】常规增强CT发现13例肺栓塞,栓塞动脉107支;CTPA确诊9例,栓塞动脉139支。【结论】CTpA相对常规增强CT灵敏性更高,但后者仍有较高临床价值,CTPA确诊并非必需。
[Objective]To observe the clinical value of conventional enhancement of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) vs CTPA for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. [Methods]Thirty patients unsuspected of pulmonary embolism who were found by conventional enhanced-CT from March 2009 to January 2010 were collected. The conventional 3D-reconstruction was performed for the original data by using MPR technology. CTA of pulmonary vessel was performed in 2 days. MIP, VRT and MPR technology were used for the 3D-reconstruction of the original data of lung arteries. [Results] Thirteen cases of pulmonary embolism and 107 embolism arteries were found by conventional enhanced-CT. Nine cases of pulmonary embolism and 107 embolism arteries were confirmed by CTPA. [Conclusion] CTPA is more sensitive than conventional enhanced-CT, but the latter still has high clinical value. Therefore, CTPA is not so necessary.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©甘肃中医药大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-8 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心