详细信息

Compression versus no compression after endovenous radiofrequency ablation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials  ( SCI-EXPANDED收录)   被引量:5

文献类型:期刊文献

英文题名:Compression versus no compression after endovenous radiofrequency ablation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

作者:Zhang, Dengxiao[1,2];Shi, Chaohai[2];Zhang, Yuan[1,2];Cui, Qi[2];Zhai, Shaobo[1,2];Huang, Yalong[1,2];Zhou, Cong[1,2];Chen, Quan[2]

第一作者:Zhang, Dengxiao

通信作者:Chen, Q[1]

机构:[1]Gansu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Clin Med Coll 1, Lanzhou, Peoples R China;[2]Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China

第一机构:甘肃中医药大学

通信机构:[1]corresponding author), Gansu Prov Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China.

年份:2022

卷号:37

期号:8

起止页码:555

外文期刊名:PHLEBOLOGY

收录:;Scopus(收录号:2-s2.0-85132364974);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000813130100001)】;

基金:This work was financially supported by Open Fund of Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Molecular Diagnosis and Precision Therapy of Surgical Tumors (18JR2RA033).

语种:英文

外文关键词:radiofrequency ablation; varicose veins; compression therapy; meta-analysis

摘要:Objectives The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare compression with no-compression, after radiofrequency endothermal ablation of a truncal varicose vein. Methods Databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Cochran Library, and Web of Science, were independently searched by two researchers for relevant literature, preliminary screening was performed, and the full text was read to select studies that met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the included literature was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. Results A total of four randomized controlled trials were included and a total of 552 patients were involved. Among them, 273 patients were in the compression group and 279 in the no-compression group. Meta-analysis results showed that the pain using the 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale was lower in the compression group than the pain in the no-compression group (MD = -4.22, 95% CI = -7.95 - -0.49, p = 0.03). No significant differences in terms of occlusion rate (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.96-1.02, p = 0.55), Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (MD = 0.46, 95% CI = -0.80-1.73, p = 0.47), and complications (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.61-2.94, p = 0.47) were observed between groups. Conclusions This meta-analysis suggests that compression therapy reduced post-operative pain compared to the no-compression group. However, no additional advantages were observed in terms of occlusion rates, quality of life scores and complications.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©甘肃中医药大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-8 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心