文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：我国省级层面“互联网+护理服务”政策分析研究

英文题名：Analysis and research on policy of"Internet+Nursing Service"at the provincial level in China

作者：王金炎[1];张凤娃[2];武红[3];丁兆红[4];李秀霞[7];周玉珊[5];刘金萍[6];张雪[1];张亚辉[1]

第一作者：王金炎

机构：[1]甘肃中医药大学护理学院,兰州市730000;[2]甘肃省人民医院烧伤二病区;[3]甘肃省人民医院妇科一病区;[4]甘肃省人民医院护理部;[5]甘肃省人民医院超声科;[6]甘肃省人民医院胸外一科;[7]兰州大学公共卫生学院

第一机构：甘肃中医药大学护理学院

年份：2023

卷号：23

期号：1

起止页码：25

中文期刊名：中国护理管理

外文期刊名：Chinese Nursing Management

收录：CSTPCD;;CSCD:【CSCD2023_2024】；

基金：国家自然科学基金面上项目(72074103);甘肃省科技计划资助项目(21CX6ZA031);甘肃省卫生行业科研计划项目(GSWSKY—2019—59)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：“互联网+护理服务”;政策工具;政策文本;内容分析

外文关键词："Internet+nursing service";policy tools;policy texts;content analysis

摘要：目的:基于政策工具角度分析我国省级层面“互联网+护理服务”政策文本的内容和结构,为后续相关政策的优化与完善提供参考。方法:构建“政策工具—发展过程”二维分析框架,采用内容分析法对各省“互联网+护理服务”政策文本进行量化分析。结果:共纳入13份政策文本,部委单独发文数量(61.5%)多于联合发文数量(38.5%);共生成169条文本编码,其中供给型、环境型、需求型政策工具分别占比19.5%、62.1%、18.3%,政策探索阶段、试点阶段、推广阶段分别占比6.5%、50.3%、43.2%。结论:各省份三类政策工具内部结构不均衡;环境型政策工具运用过多;各阶段政策工具侧重点不同;部门间缺少协作,后期仍有优化空间。
Objective:To analyze the contents and structure of China’s"Internet+nursing service"policy text at the provincial level from the perspective of policy tools,and to provide reference for the optimization and improvement of subsequent related policies.Methods:The two-dimensional analysis framework of"policy tools-development process"was developed.The content analysis was used to quantitatively analyze the policy text of"Internet+nursing service"in each province.Results:A total of 13 policy texts were included,percentage of documents issued by relevant ministries and commissions alone(61.5%)was significantly higher than that of documents jointly issued by multiple ministries and commissions(38.5%).A total of 169 text codes were generated,of which supply-based policy tools,environment-based policy tools,and demand-based policy tools accounted for 19.5%,62.1%and 18.3%respectively;policy exploration stage,pilot stage and promotion stage accounted for 6.5%,50.3%and 43.2%respectively.Conclusion:The internal structure of the three types of policy tools in each province is not balanced.The environmental policy tools are used too frequently.There are differences in the policy focus in each stage and there is a lack of coordination between departments.There is still space for policy optimization in the later stage.