文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Efficacy and safety of intraoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

作者：Liu, Bin[1];Ge, Long[2];Wang, Jing[3];Chen, Ya-Qiong[1];Ma, Shi-Xun[1];Ma, Pei-Lan[1];Zhang, Yun-Qiang[1];Yang, Ke-Hu[4];Cai, Hui[1]

第一作者：Liu, Bin

通信作者：Cai, H[1]

机构：[1]Gansu Prov Hosp, Gen Surg Clin Med Ctr, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[2]Lanzhou Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Evidence Based Social Sci Res Ctr, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[3]Gansu Univ Chinese Med, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China;[4]Lanzhou Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China

第一机构：Gansu Prov Hosp, Gen Surg Clin Med Ctr, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China

通信机构：[1]corresponding author), Gansu Prov Hosp, Gen Surg Clin Med Ctr, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China.

年份：2021

卷号：13

期号：1

起止页码：69

外文期刊名：WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY

收录：;Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85099918170);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000609880800006)】；

基金：Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province, China, No. 18JR3RA052; Gansu Province Da Vinci robot high end diagnosis and treatment personnel training project; National Key Research and Development Program Task Book, No. 2018YFC1311506; Lanzhou Talent Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project Task Contract, No. 2016RC-56; 2019 Graduate Innovation Fund Project, No. 2020CX50.

语种：英文

外文关键词：Intraoperative radiotherapy; Rectal cancer; Systematic review; External beam radiation therapy; Randomized controlled trials; Meta-analysis

摘要：BACKGROUND In recent years, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has been increasingly used for the treatment of rectal cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of IORT for the treatment of rectal cancer are still controversial. AIM To evaluate the value of IORT for patients with rectal cancer. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science databases, and conference abstracts and included randomized controlled trials and observational studies on IORT vs non-IORT for rectal cancer. Dichotomous variables were evaluated by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), hazard ratio (HR) and 95%CI was used as a summary statistic of survival outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.15.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software. RESULTS In this study, 3 randomized controlled studies and 12 observational studies were included with a total of 1460 patients, who are mainly residents of Europe, the United States, and Asia. Our results did not show significant differences in 5-year overall survival (HR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.60-1.06; P = 0.126); 5-year disease-free survival (HR = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.73-1.22; P = 0.650); abscess (OR = 1.10, 95%CI = 0.67-1.80; P = 0.713), fistulae (OR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.33-1.89; P = 0.600); wound complication (OR = 1.21, 95%CI = 0.62-2.36; P = 0.575); anastomotic leakage (OR = 1.09, 95%CI = 0.59-2.02; P = 0.775); and neurogenic bladder dysfunction (OR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.31-1.55; P = 0.369). However, the meta-analysis of 5-year local control was significantly different (OR = 3.07, 95%CI = 1.66-5.66; P = 0.000). CONCLUSION The advantage of IORT is mainly reflected in 5-year local control, but it is not statistically significant for 5-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and complications.