文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：生物反馈电刺激联合中药涂擦治疗外阴硬化性苔藓疗效观察

英文题名：Therapeutic effect of biofeedback electrical stimulation combined with traditional Chinese medicine rubbing in the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus

作者：张立环[1];樊其亮[2];马彦苗[2];曹凯莉[1]

第一作者：张立环

机构：[1]甘肃中医药大学附属医院妇产科,甘肃兰州730020;[2]甘肃中医药大学护理学院,甘肃兰州730000

第一机构：甘肃中医药大学第二附属医院

年份：2024

卷号：40

期号：5

起止页码：750

中文期刊名：现代医药卫生

外文期刊名：Journal of Modern Medicine & Health

基金：甘肃省自然科学基金项目(22JR11RA129)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：生物反馈电刺激;中药涂擦;外阴硬化性苔藓;疗效

外文关键词：Biofeedback electrical stimulation;Traditional Chinese medicine rubbing;Vulvar lichen sclerosus;Curative effect

摘要：目的探讨生物反馈电刺激联合中药涂擦对外阴硬化性苔藓(VLS)患者的治疗效果。方法选择甘肃中医药大学附属医院妇产科2022年1-12月收治的60例患者为研究对象,按照患者入院顺序随机分为对照组和观察组各30例。对照组患者给予中药涂擦治疗,观察组患者给予生物反馈电刺激联合中药涂擦治疗。对比2组患者治疗前后外阴瘙痒程度、皮肤颜色、皮肤弹性症状及体征评分及临床疗效。结果观察组患者治疗后外阴瘙痒程度[(0.77±0.50)分]、皮肤颜色[(1.03±0.56)分]、皮肤弹性[(0.60±0.56)分]症状及体征评分均低于对照组[分别为(1.17±0.59)、(1.47±0.78)、(1.17±0.75)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者治疗后总有效率[96.7%(29/30)]高于对照组[83.3%(25/30)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论生物反馈电刺激联合中药涂擦治疗VLS疗效显著,能够改善临床症状,治疗效果优于单纯中药涂擦。
Objective To explore the clinical effect of biofeedback electrical stimulation combined with traditional Chinese medicine rubbing in the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus(VLS).Methods A total of 60 patients with VLS admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine from January to December 2022 were selected for the study,and they were randomly divided into 30 cases each in the control group and the observation group according to the order of patient admission.The control group was treated with traditional Chinese medicine rubbing and the observation group was treated with biofeedback electrical stimulation combined with traditional Chinese medicine rubbing.The degree of vulvar itching,skin color,skin elasticity symptom and sign score and clinical efficacy of the two groups before and after treatment were compared.Results After treatment,the degree of vulval pruritus[(0.77±0.50)points],skin color[(1.03±0.56)points],skin elasticity[(0.60±0.56)points]symptoms and signs score in the observation group were lower than those in the control group[(1.17±0.59),(1.47±0.78),(1.17±0.75)points,respectively],the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The total effective rate after treatment in the observation group[96.7%(29/30)]was higher than that in the control group[83.3%(25/30)],the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Biofeedback electrical stimulation combined with traditional Chinese medicine rubbing for the treatment of VLS has significant efficacy,can significantly improve clinical symptoms,and the therapeutic effect is better than that of traditional Chinese medicine rubbing alone.