文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Bibliometric Analysis on COVID-19: A Comparison of Research Between English and Chinese Studies

作者：Fan, Jingchun[1,2];Gao, Ya[3,4];Zhao, Na[1];Dai, Runjing[1];Zhang, Hailiang[1];Feng, Xiaoyan[1];Shi, Guoxiu[1,5];Tian, Jinhui[3,4];Chen, Che[6];Hambly, Brett D.[1,7];Bao, Shisan[1,7]

第一作者：樊景春

通信作者：Bao, SS[1];Bao, SS[2]

机构：[1]Gansu Univ Chinese Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou, Peoples R China;[2]Gansu Univ Chinese Med, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Lanzhou, Peoples R China;[3]Lanzhou Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Evidence Based Med Ctr, Lanzhou, Peoples R China;[4]Key Lab Evidence Based Med & Knowledge Translat G, Lanzhou, Peoples R China;[5]Lanzhou Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou, Peoples R China;[6]Gansu Univ Chinese Med, Sch Clin Med, Lanzhou, Peoples R China;[7]Univ Sydney, Sch Med Sci, Fac Med & Sci, Discipline Pathol,Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia

第一机构：甘肃中医药大学公共卫生学院

通信机构：[1]corresponding author), Gansu Univ Chinese Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Lanzhou, Peoples R China;[2]corresponding author), Univ Sydney, Sch Med Sci, Fac Med & Sci, Discipline Pathol,Charles Perkins Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia.|[10735e9d5e7087247e71b]甘肃中医药大学公共卫生学院;[10735]甘肃中医药大学;

年份：2020

卷号：8

外文期刊名：FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH

收录：;Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-85090003737);WOS:【SSCI(收录号:WOS:000566218300001)，SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000566218300001)】；

基金：This work was supported by the Talent Introduction Program of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine [grant number 2016YJRC-01]; the Innovation Capacity Improvement Special Project on COVID-19 Prevention and Control from Gansu University of Chinese Medicine [grant number 2020XGZX-10]; University Innovation Capacity Improvement Project in Gansu Province; and SJTU grants [grant number 2019].

语种：英文

外文关键词：bibliometric; COVID-19 outbreaks; SARS-CoV-2; English; Chinese

摘要：Background:As an emerging infectious disease, COVID-19 has garnered great research interest. We aimed to explore the differences between English language and Chinese language Medical/Scientific journals publications, particularly aiming to explore the efficacy/contents of the literature published in English and Chinese in relation to the outcomes of management and characterization of COVID-19 during the early stage of COVID-19 pandemic. Methods:Publications on COVID-19 research were retrieved from both English and Chinese databases. Bibliometric analyses were performed using VOSviewer 1.6.14, and CiteSpace V software. Network maps were generated to evaluate the collaborations between different authors, countries/provinces, and institutions. Results:A total of 143 English and 721 Chinese original research articles and reviews on COVID-19 were included in our study. Most of the authors and institutions of the papers were from China before March 1st, 2020, however, the distribution of authors and institutions were mainly in developed countries or more wealthy areas of China. The range of the keywords in English publications was more extensive than those in Chinese. Traditional Chinese Medicine was seen more frequently in Chinese papers than in English. Of the 143 articles published in English, 54 articles were published by Chinese authors only and 21 articles were published jointly by Chinese and other overseas authors. Conclusions:The publications in English have enabled medical practitioners and scientists to share/exchange information, while on the other hand, the publications in the Chinese language have provided complementary educational approaches for the local medical practitioners to understand the essential and key information to manage COVID-19 in the relatively remote regions of China, for the general population with a general level of education.